A Comprehensive Tutorial on Command Differences Between Slurm, LSF, Cobalt, and Flux Schedulers

Introduction:

When it comes to managing high-performance computing (HPC) workloads, different schedulers offer varying sets of commands and functionalities. In this tutorial, we will explore the command differences between four popular HPC schedulers: Slurm, LSF (Load Sharing Facility), Cobalt, and Flux. Understanding these differences will help users efficiently navigate and leverage the capabilities of each scheduler.

  1. Slurm Scheduler:

a. Job Submission:

  • Slurm: sbatch my_script.sh

b. Job Status:

  • Slurm: squeue -u username

c. Job Cancellation:

  • Slurm: scancel JOB_ID

d. Job Details:

  • Slurm: scontrol show job JOB_ID

Advantages:

  • Robust and widely used scheduler in HPC environments.
  • Provides extensive features for job scheduling and resource allocation.
  • Supports complex job dependencies and accounting mechanisms.

Disadvantages:

  • Command syntax might appear complex for beginners.
  • Lack of native graphical interface may require CLI expertise for advanced usage.

  • LSF Scheduler:

a. Job Submission:

  • LSF: bsub -J my_job_name < my_script.sh

b. Job Status:

  • LSF: bjobs

c. Job Cancellation:

  • LSF: bkill JOB_ID

d. Job Output:

  • LSF: bpeek JOB_ID

Advantages:

  • Offers excellent scalability and performance in large-scale HPC clusters.
  • Easy-to-use command-line interface for job management.
  • Provides detailed job output and error logs for debugging.

Disadvantages:

  • Proprietary software, which might require licensing fees.
  • Documentation and community support may not be as extensive as open-source schedulers.

  • Cobalt Scheduler:

a. Job Submission:

  • Cobalt: qsub my_script.sh

b. Job Status:

  • Cobalt: qstat

c. Job Cancellation:

  • Cobalt: qdel JOB_ID

d. Job Output:

  • Cobalt: cat job.JOB_ID.out

Advantages:

  • Simple and user-friendly command-line interface.
  • Efficient job queuing and execution.
  • Well-suited for HPC environments with a large number of compute nodes.

Disadvantages:

  • Limited built-in support for complex job dependencies.
  • Less commonly used outside specific HPC clusters.

  • Flux Scheduler:

a. Job Submission:

  • Flux: flux submit --nnodes=4 --ntasks=16 my_script.sh

b. Job Status:

  • Flux: flux jobs

c. Job Cancellation:

  • Flux: flux kill JOB_ID

d. Job Output:

  • Flux: flux exec cat out.JOB_ID

Advantages:

  • Designed for extreme scalability and dynamic resource management.
  • Provides efficient utilization of resources in large HPC environments.
  • Supports flexible job submission options and resource allocation.

Disadvantages:

  • Might have a steeper learning curve for beginners.
  • Still relatively new compared to other well-established schedulers.

Conclusion:

Each scheduler has its own set of commands for job submission, status checking, job cancellation, and retrieving job output. In this tutorial, we covered Slurm, LSF, Cobalt, and Flux schedulers, providing examples of their respective commands, advantages, and disadvantages. As you work with different HPC systems, understanding these differences will help you efficiently manage your computational tasks and take advantage of the specific capabilities offered by each scheduler.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PyTorch Tutorial: Using ImageFolder with Code Examples

A Tutorial on IBM LSF Scheduler with Examples

Explaining Chrome Tracing JSON Format